drew wrote:As for results... they are not released on purpose to add a little drama. The rest is just YOUR opinion.
As for the complaint about a few people on the course... The course belongs to the RUNNERS. Not the coachs... not the fans... not someone's dog that's just to much a part of the family to leave at home... NO ONE HAS A RIGHT TO BE ON THE COURSE DURING THE RACE PERIOD. You would not be expect to be allowed to stand on the 30 yard line during a football game just becuase the games being played on the other end. A coach did in fact convince a worker that they were allowed on the course and DID interfere with a runner from another team. THAT IS WHY THEY ARE SO TOUGH ON THE FANS DURING THE RACE. If you do not understand that, that is your problem, that will NOT CHANGE. That is an IHSAA directive to protect the RUNNERS. As a fan you do not have a right to be on the course.
Just_The_Facts wrote:Was there such a time crunch to get teams and fans out of the facility that all team scores were not announced? Some teams have to travel 4 hours so I don't think they would have minded waiting an extra minute or two to hear all 24 teams recognized rather than the top 12. After the announcement of the top 12 teams, the 13 - 24 teams were not allowed to pick up results until all the awards were completed. I personaly would have liked to hear all the results.
isuxcjb wrote:I was up in the finish building during the awards ceremony and I was next to the announcer. He asked if they (they being IHSAA) wanted all 24 teams placements read off. He was told not to and only do the top 12. So that was why the top 12 was only announced.
drew wrote:
As for evening the Semi-States... any given year that would change... so you would change the entire state tourney every year so that you can get the state finals match up YOU want? Thats insane. If they change to a 5 semi-state system with 25 teams in the finals then fine but there is NO way to have a BALANCED SEMI-STATE... and yes the point of a state tourney is to crown a state champion... thats why it's the state tourney.
drew wrote:As for evening the Semi-States... any given year that would change... so you would change the entire state tourney every year so that you can get the state finals match up YOU want? Thats insane. If they change to a 5 semi-state system with 25 teams in the finals then fine but there is NO way to have a BALANCED SEMI-STATE... and yes the point of a state tourney is to crown a state champion... thats why it's the state tourney.
drew wrote:Ow and for all these post about get results... the results were on ihsaa.org within 10 minutes of the conclusion of the race. If you have an webbrowsing on your phone you could have known who won before the awards.
drew wrote:GROW UP. It's easy for you to set there at a distance and judge... those workers are there giving their time to the sport and the crowd treats them like crap. Have a little respect for the people who give up their saturday so your kids can run the state finals safe from interference.
drew wrote:
Ow and for all these post about get results... the results were on ihsaa.org within 10 minutes of the conclusion of the race. If you have an webbrowsing on your phone you could have known who won before the awards.
blsouthlaw wrote:I agree that there are many fans and even some coaches that crowd the running lines during the state meet, and I am suprised that many adults disregard (volunteer) officials that try to keep the course cleared during the race. I once again watched runners forced to follow a certain line when they could not run to one side or another of the designed course. But I am old enough to remember the days of everyone being held to one hill at South Grove to watch the State Meet.
As far as results, I believe it was insulting to not announce ALL 24 teams that participated in the meet. The fans that paid $8 a piece, and the teams that work hard to be there, deserved to hear the results. I do not know whos decision that was, but I believe it was wrong. And I am sorry, but I do not have a web phone.
One last thing, if running alongside a runner (pacing) to offer encouragement is wrong and against federation rules, is calling out encouragement from the back of the lead gator ok?
I agree too that if the coachs are not to have results until after the awards niether should the media (or the IHSAA web-site)
Colosseus wrote:Times don't matter in cross country. It is all about who you beat. Sure it's nice to say you've run 15:30 or whatever but it doesn't really mean anything. You have to beat PEOPLE and that is why it is scored the way it is. Besides at the state meet kids are going all out no matter what. The only guy that won't go all out is the state champ if he coasts in for an easy victory and even then he'll only lose a couple seconds at most.
But in reply to the main points of this thread:
1. The IHSAA should have read the top 24 teams off. It was pretty disrespectful to the teams outside of the top twelve. When they started reading results I turned to someone and said, "Wait, did they start with 12th? Or did I just miss the first 12 teams?" Just because you finished outside of the top 12 does not mean you didn't work extremely hard all season in order to make it to the state meet which is a great accomplishment. Trust me, just because a team finished outside of the top 12 does not mean they aren't a good team, there were, are, and will be some great teams that finish outside of the top 12 at state, especially in a year like this.
2. Regarding not having results immediately after meets I have mixed feelings. At state I love the suspense. Not knowing the outcome of the meet is great and when you figure out it's pretty amazing. At big meets, Culver, New Prairie, Flashrock, Eagle Classic, State Preview, stuff like that, they could hold them for a little while to build some suspense and then release them to the public. After the conclusion of the meet the results should be compiled as quickly as possible and begin to be printed so that the coaches and media members don't have to wait around to get full results to take for the bus ride home. At meets of less importance, smaller invitationals, dual meets, what have you, I don't feel there is a need to withhold results, just get them out so the public can see them.
drew wrote:I agree that all 24 team should get credit, not sure why they weren't but my point was that it was a matter of Opinion that teams that have a long drive don't care about how long the awards take.
RunIndiana wrote:I agree too that if the coachs are not to have results until after the awards niether should the media (or the IHSAA web-site)
Your sentence doesn't characterize what happened. Copies of the results were NOT available in sufficient quantities AFTER the awards ceremony was over. No one needs to know the results before they announce them. But coaches and media shouldn't have to stand in line for an hour after the awards ceremony is over and wait for copies to be printed - a few at a time.
And clear up another question - I see the word "volunteers" in many of the messages here. Are they really volunteers. I thought the IHSAA paid for the use and management of the facility and meet. Is that not true?
drew wrote:If the worst thing that happens at a state meet (or any meet of that size) is a delay in the printing of the results then I would say it was a good meet. It's easy in hind sight to know that the copier that was available did not keep up, that will be fixed before next year but my time machine does not work so I'm going to move on with my life. IHSAA pays for the costs but the people working are VOLUNTEERS. If you would like to leave me your cell phone number I will make sure you are contacted to offer your services next October.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests